Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into everyday digital environments and is transforming how individuals interact with technologies, organisations and service systems. AI-powered applications, such as conversational agents, recommendation systems, generative AI tools and service robots, are now widely integrated into consumer services, organisational processes and digital platforms. As these technologies continue to evolve, they are reshaping how value is created, delivered and experienced across digital ecosystems.Research across the information systems (IS) and organisational behaviour disciplines has increasingly recognised the transformative potential of AI technologies. Previous studies have explored how organisations manage AI deployment, how intelligent systems influence decision-making processes and how digital technologies reshape socio-technical systems within organisations and digital markets (Berente et al., 2021; Rai et al., 2019). These lines of research highlight that AI should not be understood solely as a technological artefact but rather as a socio-technical phenomenon embedded in complex organisational and societal contexts.In marketing and service contexts, AI technologies are increasingly influencing how organisations interact with consumers and deliver digital services. AI-powered systems, such as voice assistants, chatbots, recommendation algorithms and service robots, enable firms to automate interactions, personalise services and enhance decision-making processes. Emerging research demonstrates that AI technologies can enhance customer experiences, support service efficiency and augment human capabilities in both organisational and consumer environments (Ameen et al., 2021, 2025; Sabz et al., 2026). In addition, recent advances in generative AI are rapidly transforming industries by enabling organisations to generate content, analyse large volumes of information and support decision-making processes in new ways (Ameen et al., 2022; Feliciano-Cestero et al., 2023). For example, AI-driven predictive capabilities, such as Google DeepMind's AlphaGenome, reshape enquiries relating to healthcare innovation and personalised services, spanning medical prevention, diagnosis and treatment, to promote a better future (UK Parliament, 2026).Despite these opportunities, the rapid proliferation of AI technologies also raises important challenges for organisations, consumers and society. Concerns related to algorithmic bias, misinformation, privacy risks and digital manipulation are becoming increasingly prominent as AI systems gain greater autonomy and influence over digital interactions. AI-generated content, for example, can blur the boundaries between human- and machine-generated information, raising new questions about transparency, accountability and trust. Furthermore, AI-based decision systems may inadvertently reinforce existing inequalities or introduce new forms of digital vulnerability, particularly for individuals with lower levels of digital literacy or limited access to technological resources.These tensions highlight the need for deeper scholarly understanding of how AI technologies shape consumer behaviour, service experiences, organisational practices and societal outcomes. Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary perspectives that bridge marketing, service, organisational behaviour and IS research. In particular, scholars must examine how AI-enabled technologies influence human experiences, social relationships, decision-making processes and perceptions of fairness in digital environments.Against this backdrop, this special issue on “AI for a better future” aims to advance scholarly understanding of the role of AI in shaping consumer experiences, organisational practices and societal outcomes. The special issue focuses on behavioural and interdisciplinary research examining how different forms of AI technology, including generative AI, conversational agents, service robots and intelligent systems, affect individuals, organisations and society. By bringing together diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives, the contributions aim to shed light on how AI can be designed, deployed and governed in ways that enhance well-being, support responsible innovation and contribute to a more inclusive and sustainable digital future.The papers in this special issue examine how AI is reshaping digital interactions across consumer, service, workplace and societal settings. Collectively, the papers show that AI not only supports well-being, engagement and decision-making but also introduces new forms of vulnerability, anxiety, ethical tension and misinformation. The contributions can be grouped into four broad themes: (1) AI and consumer well-being in human-AI relationships; (2) AI in consumer and service experiences; (3) AI in workplace and service recovery settings and and (4) AI, responsibility and the digital society. Figure 1 summarises the organising framework that illustrates the themes derived from this special issue.Several papers explore the emotional and psychological role of AI in people's lives. Ng et al. (2026) examine relationships with AI companions by integrating the triangular theory of love and attachment theory. Using survey data from 527 users of AI companion applications, this study investigates how intimacy, passion and commitment shape attachment to AI companions and how that attachment influences social well-being. The findings show that these three components of love significantly shape attachment and that both interactive engagement and emotional attachment positively affect social well-being. This paper also identifies a moderating role for sweet deception, showing that affectionate but deceptive communication can strengthen the links between attachment and social well-being.Feng et al. (2026) study whether AI fitness instructors can help alleviate loneliness in digital workout environments. Based on a quasi-experimental design with 592 participants, this paper compares AI and human instructors and examines the roles of psychological closeness, co-presence and enjoyment. The findings show that human instructors produce stronger psychological closeness overall, but AI instructors can also help reduce loneliness, especially when users experience high co-presence and enjoyment. This paper therefore demonstrates that AI can support emotional well-being in digitally mediated fitness contexts, although its effectiveness depends on the quality of the interaction experience.Bakr et al. (2026) extend this concern with well-being by examining wearable self-trackers and digital vulnerability. Drawing on practice theory and interviews with 30 Fitbit users, this study identifies three usage patterns – light, fluctuant and intensive use – and shows that reflexivity around physical activity identity and goals shapes vulnerability to harms. Rather than treating self-tracking as uniformly beneficial, this paper highlights how AI-enabled monitoring technologies can create differentiated forms of risk depending on users' identities, goals and critical capacity.These papers show that AI can support social connection, health and self-management, but that such benefits are contingent, relational and sometimes accompanied by new forms of emotional or digital vulnerability.The second theme examines how AI shapes consumer engagement, brand relationships and service evaluations. Ekinci et al. (2026) investigate human versus AI-generated metahuman influencers in online brand engagement. Across two experiments with real brands, this study compares human influencer endorsement, metahuman influencer endorsement and brand-only conditions. The findings show that human influencers significantly enhance online brand engagement relative to a brand-only condition, primarily through attachment transfer. Metahuman influencers can also drive online brand engagement, but the moderating effect of influencer-brand fit applies only to human influencers. This paper therefore provides a nuanced view of the effectiveness of virtual influencers.Qiu et al. (2026) examine chatbot guidance in product assembly contexts. Through an online scenario experiment and a laboratory experiment, this paper investigates whether static and video chatbot guidance affect perceived meaningfulness, brand intimacy and service evaluation. The findings reveal a serial mediation effect: chatbot guidance reduces perceived meaningfulness, which in turn lowers brand intimacy and, subsequently, service evaluation. This negative effect is strongest for video chatbot guidance, although it becomes weaker when assembly tasks are more complex or when consumers have lower hands-on ability. This study therefore shows that AI support does not always enhance service experiences; in some contexts, it can reduce the sense of effort and accomplishment that consumers value.Al Amin et al. (2026) provide a systematic review of anthropomorphic AI in customer journeys. Analysing 122 articles, this study identifies key AI traits and roles and proposes the interaction-activation-outcome framework to explain how anthropomorphic AI activates cognitive, affective and social responses that shape behavioural, hedonic, utilitarian and sustainable outcomes across customer journeys. This paper provides an integrative conceptual foundation for understanding how anthropomorphic AI influences consumer responses.These papers highlight that while AI technologies can enrich customer journeys, improve online brand engagement and provide chatbot guidance, their impact depends on whether they enhance or diminish meaningful consumer involvement.The third group of papers focuses on AI in organisational and service environments. Fang et al. (2026) investigate how AI shapes job anxiety in the workplace. Using survey data from 675 respondents and drawing on the transactional theory of stress and coping, this study examines how different AI features influence AI-related stress and job anxiety. The findings reveal a dual effect: AI explainability increases job anxiety, whereas algorithm transparency reduces it. This study therefore demonstrates that different design characteristics of AI systems can either intensify or alleviate employee anxiety.Lan et al. (2026) examine AI agents in tricky complaint situations where firms must respond to users without genuinely resolving the issue. Across three experiments, this study identifies two intention-hiding strategies – evasive hiding and rationalised hiding – and tests how these interact with agent type. The findings show that users are more willing to forgive AI agents than human agents when evasive hiding is used, whereas human agents receive more favourable responses when rationalised hiding is used. These effects operate through perceived negative motives and perceived sincerity. This study further shows that different types of AI capabilities also influence these outcomes.These studies show that AI adoption in organisations affects not only operational efficiency but also employee emotions and customer interpretations of organisational intent.The final set of papers addresses broader ethical, governance and societal issues. Kirshner and Lawson (2026) examine how competitive pressure shapes responsible AI deployment. Across three experimental studies, they distinguish between horizontal unethical competition, where many competitors adopt similar unethical AI practices, and vertical unethical competition, where a competitor engages in severe unethical behaviour. The findings show that horizontal unethical competition increases the likelihood of launching unethical AI regardless of regulatory focus. By contrast, under vertical unethical competition, prevention-focused goals can counteract the pressure and promote more responsible decisions.Finally, Agarwal et al. (2026) provide a meta-synthesis on generative AI and disinformation. Integrating qualitative research on fake news, misinformation, disinformation and deepfakes, this study develops an integrated framework grounded in social information processing theory. The findings show that generative AI acts as a double-edged sword: while it facilitates the creation and dissemination of disinformation, it simultaneously offers analytical capabilities that can help detect and mitigate false content. This study therefore highlights the need for governance mechanisms, technological detection tools and stronger media literacy.Collectively, these papers broaden the focus of the special issue beyond individual-level interactions with AI and show that achieving a better AI-enabled future also depends on responsible governance, ethical decision-making and institutional responses to digital harms.The papers in this special issue make four main contributions. First, they show that AI is increasingly involved in the emotionally significant aspects of life, from companionship and loneliness to self-tracking and well-being. As AI's empathetic capabilities increasingly simulate close human relationships, new forms of consumer attachment and well-being emerge. Second, they demonstrate that AI's effects on consumer and service experiences are not uniformly positive; they may strengthen engagement in some contexts while reducing meaningfulness or authenticity in others. Third, they highlight the organisational implications of AI adoption, showing that AI shapes employee experiences, customer engagement and perceptions of organisational intent. For example, the integration of AI changes employees' interactions with customers and the nature of their daily work practices, introducing job-related strain and heightened stress. Fourth, they extend the discussion to societal and governance challenges, including responsible AI deployment and the growing problem of AI-enabled disinformation. Our special issue moves the conversation beyond overly optimistic or overly pessimistic views of AI to show that AI's contribution to a better future depends on how technologies are designed, governed and integrated into human contexts.Building on the contributions of this special issue, there is a growing need to deepen and broaden scholarly understanding of how AI can contribute to a better future for individuals, organisations and society. The papers included in this issue collectively demonstrate that AI technologies are increasingly embedded in consumer experiences, service interactions, organisational processes and digital ecosystems. While these technologies can enhance well-being, engagement and efficiency, they also introduce ethical, psychological and societal challenges.Moreover, AI should not be examined solely through a technological lens. Instead, its implications emerge through complex interactions between technological capabilities, human behaviours, organisational practices and societal contexts. AI systems increasingly function as social and emotional actors, service providers, decision-support tools and content creators. As such, their influence extends beyond operational efficiency to shape human experiences and relationships.As AI technologies continue to evolve rapidly, particularly with advances in generative AI, anthropomorphic agents and autonomous systems, future research must address both the opportunities and the risks associated with their integration into everyday life. Researchers should therefore move beyond narrow technological perspectives and examine AI as a socio-technical phenomenon embedded within broader service and digital ecosystems.Based on the insights that emerge from the contributions in this special issue, we propose four key avenues for future research: (1) AI, vulnerability and inclusive digital experiences; (2) AI-driven customer experience management; (3) AI and the future of work and (4) AI and responsible digital society. These research directions offer promising opportunities to advance theory and inform practice at the intersection of marketing, service research and digital technologies (illustrated in Figure 2).AI is increasingly integrated into everyday consumer services, from conversational agents and recommender systems to health technologies and digital companions. While these technologies offer important benefits, such as convenience, personalisation and enhanced service accessibility, they may also introduce new forms of consumer vulnerability (Bentley et al., 2024). Individuals may experience information asymmetries, algorithmic manipulation, emotional dependence on AI systems or reduced ability to critically evaluate automated recommendations.The marketing and service literatures have traditionally conceptualised vulnerability as arising from individual characteristics or situational factors. However, AI-enabled environments introduce new structural forms of vulnerability related to algorithmic opacity, data exploitation and unequal digital capabilities. Consumers with lower digital literacy, limited access to technological resources or greater reliance on AI-enabled services may be particularly exposed to such risks.As AI technologies become more autonomous and emotionally intelligent, understanding how these systems influence consumer autonomy, identity, emotions and well-being becomes increasingly important. Future research should therefore examine how organisations can design AI-enabled services that enhance accessibility and inclusion while safeguarding vulnerable individuals from potential harms. Future research could address the following questions:AI has led to various new opportunities to deliver customised experiences and reshape value delivery for stakeholders. AI-mediated touchpoints enhance efficiency, personalisation and the ongoing transformation of customer journeys across a wide range of industries. Organisations can now capitalise on data analytics and real-time insights to better understand customer preferences, anticipate needs and deliver tailored interactions. These opportunities highlight AI's ability not only to improve efficiency but also to deepen immersive, relational and emotional connections between customers and organisations. Empathetic capabilities (Huang and Rust, 2024) in customer journeys contribute to new forms of experiential value, fostering stronger emotional bonds. Service experiences also involve third-party actors who adopt different roles in service encounters, such as bystanders or endorsers (Abboud et al., 2021). Therefore, consideration should be given to how AI can effectively orchestrate seamless touchpoints for multi-actor goal alignment.As AI also becomes increasingly agentic, novel forms of customer journeys and strategies are being reinvented (Bornet et al., 2025), which call for innovative forms of experience design. However, power imbalances increase the likelihood that consumers experience negative emotions or disengagement (Abboud et al., 2023). In the AI-mediated context, where customers may perceive a lack of autonomy and limited ability to make decisions due to a lack of control or agency, firms may need effective and adaptive deployment to control to customers et al., integration of AI into service environments For example, the deployment of service robots in settings introduces that affect how customers influencing service and et al., 2023). with AI agents may affect sense of meaningfulness, brand evaluations. As a new forms of engagement are and 2025), the need for explainability and transparency in value challenges, with potential to AI, disengagement or emotional value these opportunities and important further These the role of organisations in and effective AI-driven customer experiences, the effective of AI capabilities across different key to promote greater access to services and insights into new patterns of customer engagement and disengagement with Future work could focus on the following questions:AI is transforming organisations by employee organisational effectiveness and in complex situations and By decision-making and AI to work more and focus on et al., 2024). the organisational AI and in customer in service recovery (Huang and Rust, the impact of AI extends beyond operational efficiency to shape employees' experiences with and perceptions of organisations. For example, the by AI robots in can strengthen employees' which in turn organisational et al., Furthermore, employees' use of generative AI's capabilities their they are more to tasks as opportunities rather than et al., However, a phenomenon in which service on AI to their “AI and is a growing issue that a to effective research highlights of AI in service such as to that be perceived as or when human et al., 2023). the AI agents service can significantly shape of the recovery are research technologies have become a of society. decisions to access to services and they effectively in and life. As their influence broader societal have the potential negative implications of AI adoption, including social and ethical privacy and of et al., 2023). For example, research has how and systems by AI may existing human and and outcomes and AI technologies produce for and patterns of and et al., deployed in and in third AI systems risk and social by interactions or users et al., are not but deeper structural systems not societal they within algorithmic and their impact and 2021). to their reliance on of both and AI technologies risks to data and including to data manipulation and identity as as enabling practices such as personalised online and et al., also offers opportunities for the creation and the of more forms of misinformation. For – digitally media – can be to consumers in the and while generative AI such as may generate or content et al., Researchers have also the use of AI-enabled as tools to help manage their how such tools can increase the risk of to users and in and and AI also offers potential to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of services, support systems and governance and contribute to social for example, by to et al., 2023). AI integration in the a tension between and societal and The of AI systems is by such as efficiency, and which can with transparency and These are particularly in automated decision-making systems, where processes may outcomes that or social research should explore this tension and examine how AI technologies can be designed, and deployed in ways that consumers and to from the while societal and Future studies could address the following contributions of this special issue highlight the need for interdisciplinary research to drive impact and between organisations, AI and to shape a better AI-driven AI to a of benefits, tensions and challenges also with AI adoption and These have explored various methodological and from at emotionally close relationships to research highlights how AI can contribute to a better future for consumers by fostering relationships through interactions, while such psychological also to vulnerability from digital consumer contexts, AI how work is and employees' job and well-being. is also in organisations, where AI-driven experiences enhance but may also to consumer or perceptions of due to AI-generated misinformation. these important social questions about how effective and regulatory can be to manage these we call for further research that the dual nature of AI and responsible AI to mitigate that from AI integration or is a growing need for to adopt digital responsibility strategies and ethical AI practices to AI-related societal tensions and reduce risks such as of algorithmic and disinformation. In addition, the to a responsible digital requires new ways of as as more AI systems, and that promote inclusive AI literacy and In light of digital technologies should be designed, and to alleviate potential and promote and more sustainable in the of are to the of as as the for their support for this special issue. who and for the
Source
Liliane Abboud; Nisreen Ameen; Valentina Pitardi; Hyunju Shin. Internet Research, 2026. DOI: 10.1108/intr-06-2026-034